Agroecology

The dataset is the result of a crop simulation and machine learning exercise to evaluate the irrigation potentials in sub-Saharan Africa. Samples of points (representative for each Agro-ecological zone in Africa) have been selected from a cropland map (from Tubliello et al., 2023) and, by using the DSSAT crop model fed with soil information from the ISRIC project (https://isric.org/projects/soil-information-system-for-africa-soils4africa/) and 10 years of daily climate data (from NASAPOWER), simulations have been conducted in each location under rainfed conditions and optimal irrigation. This last has been achieved y letting the crop model add irrigation water each time a water stress was perceived. Other management practices have been set as realistic as possible, particularly the amount of provided fertilization has been kept low to represent current conditions. Yields have been finally averaged along the different years of simulations to generate expected yields. Finally, by using the XGboost algorithm fed with the same soil and climatic variables used for the crop model, yields under both rainfed and irrigation conditions have been imputed to all remaining cropland locations in Sub-Saharan Africa. What is presented here are the yield increases, as percentages over rainfed yields, obtainable in each location for the four simulated cereals: maize, millet, rice and sorghum.

All known formal and informal settlements of forcibly displaced and stateless people in Africa from UNHCR’s GIS database as of November 2025. Population in the settlement. It may include several categories: Refugees, Returnees, IDP, Asylum-seeker, Stateless and Mixed.Formal Settlement: Formal settlements are places where official land is allocated for a group of asylum seekers, refugees, or IDPs. They are accommodated in purpose-built settlements with access to facilities and services. An official management entity is assigned. Camps are a type of formal settlement. Informal Settlement: In an informal settlement, a group of asylum-seekers, refugees, or IDPs choose to settle in self-identified spontaneous sites. Self-settled settlements are often located on state-owned, private, or communal land, with or without negotiations with the local population or private landowners.

Crop conditions monitoring is highly relevant for food security early warning and response planning in food-insecure areas of the world. GEOGLAM (the Group on Earth Observations' Global Agricultural Monitoring Initiative) aims to reinforce the international community's capacity to produce and disseminate relevant, timely, and accurate forecasts of agricultural production at national, regional, and global scales using Earth Observation data. Copernicus4GEOGLAM, one of the Copernicus Land Monitoring Services managed by the EC Joint Research Centre, aims to produce baseline information that allows countries in Africa to improve their agricultural monitoring systems. Building upon the Joint Research Centre’s frameworks for utilizing Remote Sensing (RS) and Geographic Information System (GIS) resources to evaluate agroecological performance, this spatial dataset provides critical baseline intelligence on cropping systems to support resilience assessment and food security planning for a selected region in Kenya,. The dataset comprises two layers: Number of Crop Types (Crop Richness): The absolute count of distinct cultivated crop species within a given spatial resolution. Crop richness serves as a fundamental baseline indicator of agricultural variety. It allows analysts to rapidly distinguish between highly vulnerable monoculture landscapes and more traditional, diverse multi-cropping or intercropping systems present in the Kenyan study area. Crop Diversity (Shannon Diversity Index): Going beyond a simple count, the Shannon Diversity Index evaluates both the abundance (the number of different crop types) and the evenness (the proportional spatial distribution of those crops). A higher index value indicates a highly diverse and balanced cropping ecosystem. Because evenly diverse systems are typically more resilient to climate volatility, pests, and diseases, this layer is a vital proxy for assessing local agroecological health.

Reference evapotranspiration (Global - Monthly - ~10 km) August 2025- AQUASTAT (FAO) AgERA5 derived. Reference evapotranspiration per month with a spatial resolution of 0.1 degree. Unit: mm month-1. The dataset contains monthly values for global land areas, excluding Antarctica, since 1979. The dataset has been prepared according to the FAO Penman - Monteith method as described in FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper 56. https://data.apps.fao.org/catalog/dataset/c91430cc-681e-4ca8-a5f4-8c97dc92c547/resource/ff49908e-2e07-48b3-8deb-0c69af411859

Water Footprint in Africa, considered as the sum of both the green and blue WF and defined as the ratio between evapotranspiration (in m3 per hectare) and crop yield (in ton per hectare). The values are expressed in m3/ton.

The map is based on Copernicus Global Land Cover data which shows actual land cover (what physically covers land across the globe—forests, grasslands, croplands, lakes, wetlands, built-up area, etc) at 100m x 100m resolution. The land cover data for Africa was overlaid on (high resolution) satellite imagery of Africa, which is then used to determine the land use (by visual interpretation) associated with the various land cover patterns on the Copernicus Global Land Cover map.Copernicus land cover data offers several advantages: it is of high quality, has a high resolution (100m x 100m), and offers time series satellite imagery. More importantly, the Copernicus Global Land Service is a continuous process and its datasets are updated annually. This means that the Soils4Africa map of agricultural land can be updated every time the land cover data for the new year becomes available (the map is currently based on 2019 data).The Copernicus dataset already includes the category ‘cropland,’ which by definition is part of agricultural land. The Soils4Africa map broadens the scope of that dataset by infering information on agricultural use and including other kinds of agricultural land use such as grazing pastures and plantations.When land is mapped as other than ‘cropland'-- like ‘shrubland’ for example-- it is more difficult to interpret and determine whether it is under agricultural use. The Copernicus dataset includes information about ‘fractional cover’-- or the percentage of a particular pixel under a particular kind of land cover (for example, 30% of a 100m x 100m pixel could be forest and 20% could be shrubland). The Soils4Africa map takes into account how fractional cover varies over an area to establish rules for interpreting its land cover data to determine whether it is under agricultural use and for what purpose. These rules were validated by comparing it with ground level information on land use (or land use pattern) for specific areas drawn from the interpretation of satellite imagery from Google Earth.For example, ground-level observation shows that forest cover upwards of 30% in a given area when matched by shrubland cover of over 30%, is characterized by woody vegetation with a smooth canopy. Therefore, such area is more likely to be under plantations rather than natural forest. Thus, such an area should be counted as agricultural land, even if less than 15% of it is under crops.

This dataset provides the global geographic distribution of key livestock species—cattle, sheep, and goats—for the year 2010, sourced from the Gridded Livestock of the World (GLW 3) database. Expressed as the total number of animals per pixel at a spatial resolution of 5 minutes of arc, these layers are essential for diverse applications in agricultural socio-economics, food security, environmental impact assessments, and epidemiology.

Substantial crop losses occur at various stages along the postharvest value chain. Losses result from poor handling and storage practices combined with limited awareness, infrastructure, and knowledge. The African Postharvest Losses Information System (APHLIS) (www.aphlis.net) is the foremost international effort to collect, analyse and disseminate data on postharvest losses of cereal grains in sub-Saharan Africa. The cumulative % loss in weight incurred during harvesting, drying, threshing/shelling, winnowing, household-level storage, transport and market-level storage for the selected crop, location, and year is presented. Complimentary data sets are collected and used to convert this % loss into absolute loss values in tonnes, US$ and nutrients, along with the nutritional and financial impacts of these losses by province and country. Understanding the magnitude of postharvest loss, the points in the value chain where losses occur, and the causes and impacts of loss helps decision-makers formulate effective policies and invest in successful postharvest loss programmes.

Substantial crop losses occur at various stages along the postharvest value chain. Losses result from poor handling and storage practices combined with limited awareness, infrastructure, and knowledge. The African Postharvest Losses Information System (APHLIS) (www.aphlis.net) is the foremost international effort to collect, analyse and disseminate data on postharvest losses of cereal grains in sub-Saharan Africa. The cumulative % loss in weight incurred during harvesting, drying, threshing/shelling, winnowing, household-level storage, transport and market-level storage for the selected crop, location, and year is presented. Complimentary data sets are collected and used to convert this % loss into absolute loss values in tonnes, US$ and nutrients, along with the nutritional and financial impacts of these losses by province and country. Understanding the magnitude of postharvest loss, the points in the value chain where losses occur, and the causes and impacts of loss helps decision-makers formulate effective policies and invest in successful postharvest loss programmes.

Substantial crop losses occur at various stages along the postharvest value chain. Losses result from poor handling and storage practices combined with limited awareness, infrastructure, and knowledge. The African Postharvest Losses Information System (APHLIS) (www.aphlis.net) is the foremost international effort to collect, analyse and disseminate data on postharvest losses of cereal grains in sub-Saharan Africa. The cumulative % loss in weight incurred during harvesting, drying, threshing/shelling, winnowing, household-level storage, transport and market-level storage for the selected crop, location, and year is presented. Complimentary data sets are collected and used to convert this % loss into absolute loss values in tonnes, US$ and nutrients, along with the nutritional and financial impacts of these losses by province and country. Understanding the magnitude of postharvest loss, the points in the value chain where losses occur, and the causes and impacts of loss helps decision-makers formulate effective policies and invest in successful postharvest loss programmes.